US

Global Supply Chains

Question A:

Firms’ incentives to reduce costs by sourcing inputs and products abroad have caused many American industries to become more vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Private firms have inadequate incentives to make investments to reduce the risk that disruptions in the supply of imports will cause shortages and raise domestic prices.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Global supply chain disruptions are the main driver of elevated US inflation over the past year.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Complex supply chains tend to create "risk externalities" domestically and globally, which are often uninternalized.
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
There are many types of supply chain disruptions--here you have the international kind in mind I assume.
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
One caveat: supply chain disruptions can also occur within a country.
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Domestic supply chains can also be complex and delicate.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
True, but global pandemics didn't happen often, so hard to see how better incentives would have helped.
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Cost cutting through lower inventories of parts makes production less resilient. That could happen with domestic supply and bottlenecks too.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Not just sourcing abroad, but also just-in-time inventory management, failure to build in redundancy etc.
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Depends on the shock. When the shock facing industries is domestic, international diversification via GSCs reduces vulnerability.
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
But it can happen with sourcing at home too.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
But, those incentives have changed. Expect to see more diversified sourcing.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
What's the counterfactual about how the domestic alternative is structured? is it geographically diversified? wildfire, hurricane risk, etc
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Certainly to global Covid disruptions. But domestic supply chains also can have vulnerabilities so a comparison is tricky.
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Outsourcing makes supply disruption possible---but the outsourcing need not be foreign to create vulnerability.
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Firms trade off supply-chain cost and reliability. Sourcing abroad moves them along the frontier toward lower-cost/less-reliability.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
This does not imply that international sourcing is inefficient
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Other cost-reducing measures, such as JIT inventory management, also contribute.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
This also, theoretically, follows from the "risk externalities". Security investments in a network benefit other firms and consumers
-see background information here
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
No reason that private firms would fully internalize this public goods/national security concern.
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
After all being the only one who can supply in a crisis has its attractions.
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
In might make sense to introduce stress tests for global value chains
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Inadequate from what perspective? They won't hold excess capacity for national rather than private interests certainly.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
see above.
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
I’m no expert on this, but I don’t see the market failure. That’s a cost benefit trade-off.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Though I'd put it somewhat differently. Financial-market pressures, gov policy etc. create incentives to under-insure.
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Again, broad international diversification is the best way to reduce this risk, and firms have invested heavily in this.
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
It is not easy for private agents to reduce the risk of a supply disruption caused by an aggregate shock, such as a pandemic
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
The major problem was that everyone was overconfident, and no one thinks about low probability events.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Expect to see companies make investments and adjustments that reduce the likelihood of this going forward.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Must depend on the size of the firm, surely walmart worries about this.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
There is an externality---a firm that protects itself against disruption also protects the firms it supplies; see Elliott and Golub (2020)
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Yes, externalities, but most of impacts are on (short-sighted) firms.
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
If a firm's supply is disrupted, that generates disruptions all further down the supply chain that the firm doesn't necessarily internalize.
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Firms do not internalize the externalities their disruptions impose on others. It is less clear how significant these externalities are.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
There may be an externality here, but I've seen no evidence that it's important.
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
There is an externality; free-riding seems likely.
-see background information here

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Supply chain disruptions are a contributing factor, but probably not the "main" factor.
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Main? Panemic related shifts in demand from services to consumer goods and lower labor supply are also important.
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
It's one of the drivers. Two others: demand surge due to pandemic aid transfer programs + consumption shift from services to goods
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
it is one driver among several others, not "the" driver.
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hard to definitively disentangle the impact of supply and demand shocks.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Not sure what "main" means. I think they were main at the beginning.
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Supply and demand are both factors. Who is to say which is greater
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Perhaps "a main" rather than "the main." Demand pressure and changes in the composition of demand also important.
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
High demand, DOMESTIC supply chain disruptions, and labor shortages are more important.
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
They are one driver but there are others: fiscal stimulus and the great resignation
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
A driver but not the main driver.
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Inflation differentials tell us supply problems are important. M growth is important but "long and variable lags" make its impact unclear.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Supply plays a role. But, so does huge increase in demand from government stimulus as well as increased energy regulation.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Look at rent and wages, this has mattered but so has fiscal support and monetary policy
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Import prices have only contributed about 1.4 percentage points of inflation per year since April 2020.
-see background information here
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
I would have said "a" main driver"- surely government spending also has contributed to current demand - supply imbalances.
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Disruption is certainly one inflation driver, but there are others (e.g., the great resignation), and I don't know which is most important.
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
A driver, but many components are largely independent (energy, used cars, food).
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Clearly important but unclear if they are literally > or < 50% responsible. If you forced me, I would guess somewhat > 50%.
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Supply-chain disruptions increase cost, but there are other important forces behind inflation.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
However, fiscal policy and shifts in labor supply probably also important contributors.
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Supply chain disruptions should move relative prices, not the price level
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
An important contributing factor, not "main driver"; also labor mkt tightness and high domestic demand, both pandemic-induced.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History