Prices of Medical Supplies

Question A:

Clearing the market for surgical face masks using prices is detrimental to the public good.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Laws to prevent high prices for essential goods in short supply in a crisis would raise social welfare.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Governments should buy essential medical supplies at what would have been the market price and redistribute according to need rather than ability to pay.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Very thorny question. UK thinking about making "profiteering" illegal. Efficient to raise prices but not equitable.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Market clearing will lead the masks to go to those with the highest ability to pay, not the most need.
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
This is like war time rationing - face masks should go to those who need them not those who pay most
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Wearing a mask = producing a public good. There should be helicopter drops of masks over deprived areas.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Ultra high prices are not necessary incentives and they are clearly detrimental to the public good.
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Mask mainly protects others, not user, so externality very strong
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
As there are strong externalities involved, e.g. in hospital personnel, the usual allocational efficiency arguments do not apply fully.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Price caps lead to shortages. The government and international organizations should channel funds to ensure all concerned can afford masks
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Classis results of Weitzman suggest that quantity controls are desirable when marginal benefits are inelastic relative to costs
-see background information here
-see background information here
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Just look at what is happening in Italy!
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The effect on the public good depends a great deal on whether a credible (=enforceable) constraint can be put on face-mask quality.
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Wearing a mask protects others and people will not pay for this part of the benefit. They should be subsidised
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
depends on the trade off between short term distributional goals of the current stock versus longer term incentives for production.
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
While some price controls might help, effective regulation to eliminate low-quality products is probably more important.
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
In a crisis there has to be a better way than the price mechanism to allocate such goods, but will governments establish one?
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Depends on the elasticity of supply
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
If there are shortages of PPE for medical staff then there is higher social value to getting them this equipment than others.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
There already is a black market. Price fixing will further develop this market.
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Again a very difficult issue.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
But I can only see this working on a very temporary basis.
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
This might decrease supply and be costly. But rationing may get the goods to those who have the most time and need.
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Pros and cons
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Only if some technology is available to distribute the goods evenly.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
May need more than price control laws to improve allocation in such circumstances
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Price ceilings would deter production, without necessary implications for allocation, hence ceilings will lead to welfare losses.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
There are equity or inequality issues related to price gouging but they can be (better) addressed with policy in question 3.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Again the price mechanism will ensure entry where most needed. Government subsidies can solve the affordability problem.
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Same response applies as to A): on both efficiency and equity grounds, allocating by quantity not price is better in a crisis
-see background information here
-see background information here
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The government should provide financial support to poor people who cannot afford such goods, rather than tring to control their price.
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Let prices rise but government should subsidise purchases by lower income groups
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
if production capacity is, fixed high prices equal rents and can be regulated. but if not, firms need incentives to invest in new capacity
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
It depends how good the rationing mechanism is. And beware adverse supply response.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Even if there was a theoretical argument for this (and that's unclear) price restrictions are hard to enforce in practice.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Isn't it better to provide support to the people with low income and those who lost their jobs (as many countries actually do)?
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
In pronciple this sounds a good idea, but it depends what prices the government pays and how the purchase is financed.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
This seems like a good idea, but I worry about how well implemented it would be. Perhaps I'm particularly skeptic because of where I live.
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Clearly the best solution if it can be achieved. A small risk of cronysm in distribution, but worth taking
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Governments (especially in the EU) should group their procurements in order to reap market power.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Depends: If there is hoarding and runs on products, intervention helps; if it disrupts the supply chain (parts of ventilators), it does not
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Government may want to pay more than old market clearing price to induce supply response
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
That is a way to ridge the gap between efficiency and a more broadly defined concept of welfare.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
To earlier arguments can be added the externalities associated with mass innoculation: huge social benefits irrespective of ability to pay
-see background information here
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Supplies would then be efficient and policy would reduce inequality
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
But easier said than done
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Where there are shortages, allowing prices to rise is one way to get supply up. Getting equipment to medical staff should be first priority.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History