US

Test Scores and College Admissions

Universities that abandon temporary pandemic test-optional policies and return to requiring standardized test scores for admissions will create measurably enhanced opportunities for potentially high-achieving students from low-income backgrounds.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Test scores contain valuable information about achievement and potential, especially for students from less advantaged backgrounds.
-see background information here
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
In absence of some common measure and effort, applicants will spend time and effort on other, more subjective criteria that have less immediate statistical power,
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
The research on this point seems pretty persuasive.
-see background information here
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Standardized scores are valuable information. Schools can adjust them as appropriate for expected expenditures on tutoring.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Test scores make it possible to identify qualified people who don't come from elite feeder schools.
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
The SAT and ACT are imperfect tests. However, their introduction led to an enormous increase in meritocracy (i.e. opportunity for able students from modest backgrounds). Without the tests, students w affluent, educated parents have all the advantages in advmissions.
-see background information here
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
see the dartmouth research
-see background information here
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
I am not certain how this interacts with the Office of Civil Rights' oversight requirements. It's possible that the OCR can audit SAT submissions, and this might tie the hands of admissions committees.
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
There is plenty of room to improve testing, but test scores are a key avenue for otherwise overlooked students to catch that attention of universities.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
That was the initial motivation for developing standardized tests.
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
In absence of standardized scores, schools could switch and were switching to even more (income-correlated) manipulable criteria. I'm a little surprised anyone who ever went to school in a mixed income environment expected any other outcome.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
SAT is a strong predictor. Why ignore that but look at extra-curricular stuff like crew or tennis? Worst system is forbidding test score disclosure. Univ of CA: rethink!
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Probably should say "could" because the tests provide an opportunity to to improve, but won't necessarily cause an improvement.
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Standardized tests aren't perfect but still provide valuable information for finding students with high potential from less favorable socio-economic background.
-see background information here