State Aid

Question A:

Loosening regulations on state aid to allow targeted incentives for companies in certain sectors will substantially improve the EU’s relative attractiveness for corporate investment.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Loosening regulations on state aid will give a substantial advantage to the economies of EU members with stronger public finances.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Even if looser regulations on state aid are temporary, they risk permanent damage to the EU’s longstanding competition policy regime.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Difficult to say. One issue is where the money for the subsidies come from. ANother is where the resources come from.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
A non-coordinated policy might lead to inefficient tax competition and a "race-to-the-bottom" in tax rates.
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Good for Europe, but not necessarily good for the world
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Government interference in industries has a long track record of failure. And even the "successes" are often failures due to he massive fiscal costs. Please don't push this - it's a horrible idea!
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
"Targeted" is a keyword here. All depends on the extent of fixed costs, uncertainty and the horizon of the investment. These interventions should be coordinated across governments in order to avoid a race for subsidies.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
reluctantly. But if all major partners (China, US) play that game it would be naive not to keep an open mind!
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Distinguish between what is socially optimal and what is best response (it is a zero sum game, so if the whole world does it, then yes). Not socially optimal so we need international coordination to reduce state aid, except in some cases (infant industries, strategic importance)
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Rent-seeking might be the dominant effect
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
In contrast to the US, there are 27 EU countries starting to incentivize investment - a lot of it may be used to compete internally, thereby weakening or even nullifying the aggregate effect.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
It will have this effect on the EU's relative attractiveness (and counter US incentives) but also lead to some zero sum competition within the EU. Similar to tax competition.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
In the short run, yes. But in the long run, it will hurt the EU by undermining its single market.
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
I worry that most of the effect will be diversion of investment across EU states, so the effects will be small for the EU on aggregate.
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
While local location decisions will be influenced by subsidies, it is hard to see how the Europe versus not Europe decision could depend substantially on subsidies for most firms.
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
EU State Aid rules already have flexibility to allow for relaxation of rules for technology and reserach co-operation. Further weakening could reduce competitive forces
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Loosening state aid regulations will curb competition and all the benefits in terms of price and innovation that brings. It might help to get some green companies of the ground, but it is better to persuade the US to stop doing this.
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The regime already allows appropriate targeting. Loosening could well result in more losers than winners taking subsidy costs into account.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Ultimately tax incentives have to offset with higher taxes elsewhere. The benefits of this strategy depend on whether the government is good at picking winners when deciding on tax incentives. It is not clear European govenments are that good at it.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Capture and misguided bureaucratic/politicized likely to look large

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Again, it is not clear. There are many factors at play including resilience of firms, again where resources come from, and how this affects other industries.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Holding other things equal!
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
arithmetically so
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
It will be a big disadvantage to them. They will waste government money of various pet-subsidy schemes of politicians, using up government funding. Countries with tight budgets will not have the money to waste.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
In principle yes unless aids are considered at the European level!
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
State is not socially optimal
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Or loosening these rules might simply enable governments with more headroom to adopt larger distorting policies that are more damaging...
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
While strong public finances will allow a country to spend more, the EU procurement rules limit the possibility to target investment in a particular country - as large investment are subjected to a EU-wide call for tender.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Not sure about "substantial" - depends on how the temporary loosening is implemented (e.g., how targeted, how long, any EU funds for poorer countries, etc.)
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Even if the advantage turned out to be quantitively small, it will create a lot of unnecessary bad feelings.
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
If a country is going to it and it is economically worthwhile, then it should be possible to borrow for such state investments in private companies.
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Maybe to subsidy recipients in those economies but to the detriment of their taxpayers.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
I'm not sure this is a good economic policy but if it does have benefits I doubt if they could be characterised as substantial.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Some countries may get it right, others will get it wrong, so net advantage can turn into net loss, but countries with stronger public finances can better absorb losses

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
State aid was allowed temporarily in some sectors during the financial crisis. This does not seem to have had a too long lasting effect on EU competition policy. But this time may be different since the circumstances are so different.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
same issue: what are the new rules of the international trade game?
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Yes, I fear so...
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Again, much depends on strict implementation (temporary, targeted, limited to those affected by US IRA, etc.). Poor implementation could have this effect but weakening EU competition regime would not be good. See links on earlier IGM polls on EU competition policy below.
-see background information here
-see background information here
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
My impression is that the literature in the last two decades has found several examples of industrial policies working. Of course, sometimes is not working on average
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
There are good reasons to be flexible in a crisis, but such precedents may obviously be damaging in the long-run.
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
It is less damaging if it is temporary, but the door has been opened and more damage may be done on future occasions.
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Yes. The competition regime is an important part of what makes the European single market work well and it is best to not undermine it. Once this precedent is set, all sorts of other anti-competitive state aids could be introduced.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Temporary can turn into permanent and temporary misallocation of resources can have long-lasting effects.